Run in Circles Scream and Shout
Posted by Hazel Stone | Filed under Decision Eh
Bristol Palin, the 17 year old daughter of Sarah Palin, is pregnant and will keep the baby and marry the father, a senior McCain aide confirmed to CNN Monday.
I only have one thing to say… If this hoor can just slide right along and keep her cushy Nickelodeon (the network for KIDS!) job whilst preggers at 16, then you liberal f*ckweasels have neither jack nor sh*t to say about Palin’s daughter.
Tags: 2008 election, hype-no-tized
Help Support SimonJester.info!
September 1st, 2008
Errr, how does Nickelodeon’s decision to fire or not fire one pregnant teenager somehow provide cover for Bristol Palin? I agree wholeheartedly that everyone ought to leave the kids alone, but if I did choose to point out the obvious hypocrisy, I’ll be damned if Nickelodeon’s actions are to stop me.
September 1st, 2008
@ronbailey: My point is that the Spears girl did NOT lose her job on a KIDS network for being a bad role model, or otherwise receive any sort of censure for being knocked up at age 16.
No censure for her = no censure for Palin’s daughter. But of course there will be.
So I’m not sure what hypocrisy you’re speaking of…
September 5th, 2008
Yeah, what hypocrisy? Sarah Palin is pro-life, and apparently either Bristol is too, across the board, or Bristol has decided to be pro-life in her own difficult circumstance.
Palin apparently doesn’t support a particular kind of teaching of sex ed that seems to her, and to others, explicitly to condone and possibly to encourage sexual “exploration” by means of (the classic example) employing produce to demonstrate proper contraceptive use rather than a – pardon the expression – drier approach like illustrations or written instructions. By extension, we all assume – correctly, I’m pretty sure – that she doesn’t support premarital sex. Perhaps the hypocrisy you perceive arises from your knowing that she taught her daughter that premarital sex is OK, in contrast to her public position on the subject. Or something. If it were true, that’d be hypocrisy indeed, sort of like preaching post-racialism and ethnicity-free unity in rallies but attending a segregationist church for twenty years. But I don’t think that’s what you meant.